Autocad Vs Microstation: Summary and Evaluation

Autocad Vs Microstation Summary and EvaluationPatricia FerrerasT adequate to(p) of Contents (Jump to)What is blackguard?Auto pawl and MicroStation HistoryRe seek2D Design Features3D Design FeaturesInteroper mogul destinationBibliographyWhat is dog-iron? wienerwurst is an abbreviation of Computer Aided Design, and refers to softw be utilise to create detailed, distinct drawings and technical illustrations. blackguard software is capable of creating compressed (2D) or threesome-dimensional (3D) models. (WhatIs.com, 2011)AutoCAD and MicroStation HistoryAutoCAD was introduced in 1982 as a backdrop application. Since 2010, it has evolved into a mobile web and cloud based application, currently marketed as AutoCAD 360. (Wikipedia, 2014)MicroStation was introduced early in 1987 with the capacity to write to design ap distri nonwithstandingor points with the extension .DGN. In its early days, it had simple modification abilities, and it was capable of displaying each element in their intermediate states during placement. MicroStation V8i (SELECTseries 2)- July 2010 added integrated point cloud support. (Bentley, 2014)ResearchThe scope of my explore is to compare the two leaders software pack senesces in design, both of them are utilise by a wide range of professionals, mainly in the fileds of Engineering, Architecture and Indus run Design.Different people book different quest or preferences, but I want to keep my query as objective as possible, that is why I going to focus is three key aspects of the software, 2D, 3D and interoperability.2D Design FeaturesThe comparison is based in the la running game versions of each program, and on the available functions and slams for managing 2D designs that a CAD software provides. (Chief, 2012)AutoCAD 2013MicroStation V8iIn 2D Designing, what manufactures users happy are the features and tools that AutoCAD provides, such asThe Sketch tool which aloneows 2D Drafts to be intuitively drawnA customizable tool pa lette, color palette and command logTape prise Tool, text Box and Snap to grid functionalities,From 3D models generates 2D Drawings correct though MicroStation provides many useful tools, it is lacking some key features for 2D Designing. Its available features includeAn advanced sketch toolColor palette, tool palettes and command logs, all of which are customizableFrom 3D Models, could generate 2D Drawings3D Design FeaturesThese features include Simulation, 3D Modeling and animation using features provided by the CAD software. (Chief, 2012) (enggcyclopedia, 2012)AutoCAD 2013MicroStation V8iAutoCAD 2013 include the future(a) features and tools holded for the 3D Modeling, Rendering and lifeHas parametric Modeling ToolsMaterial changes as they occur, so it could be viewed in real timeExtrude 3D Models from 2D DrawingsPhotorealistic models could be created. prefatory animation projects are enable through its animation featuresAutoCAD is recognized as a business-oriented design tool, and is regarded as following industry standards.MicroStation provides much than of a thorough platform for 3D Modeling and Animation. It is more advanced than AutoCAD in some respectsParametric modeling tools and featuresReal time modifications stub be previewed as they are implementedMicrostation buns extrude 3D Models from 2D Drawings with 3D geometric surfacesPhotorealistic models can be achieved3D gear up is back upMicroStation claims to respect its users by providing them with a CAD environment build to put up for all their needs.InteroperabilityThis factor relates to collaboration functionality with other CAD Applications, the ability for more than iness designer to work simultaneously on unmatchable platform, cloud features, and a number of other functions. (Chief, 2012) (Alvarez, 2006)AutoCAD 2013MicroStation V8iAutoCAD 2013s full-featured user-interface and interoperability features include the followingSupport for readable and writable file formats such as DWG , PDF, 3DS, DWFThe Autodesk Cloud Feature, Autodesk 360 allows designers on the CAD Software Workspace to work a vogue from the office. It provides each user with nigh 3 GB of space, and this figure can be increased to cater for file sharing.Integration of Google MappingThe users felt that the re-design introduced with Land Development was really different from the previous applications such as CivilCAD and Softdesk.MicroStation is an application with total desegregation of other applications within Bentley or external applications that develop in a MicroStation environment . It wins the war of interoperability. The main features include the followingIt supports readable and writeable file formats including Sketchup, DWF, Revit, PDF,DWGAn AutoCAD interoperability function which allow designers to work with all of Autodesks CAD VersionsGeo-location is supported by providing designers with coordinates for actual real-life buildings. It allows integration of Google Maps, and allows for sharing and networking amid designers.Designers work is protected from intellectual theft via a digital hint featureThe users find quite easy to use the different applications of MicroStation, is very similar design.ConclusionWhich one is better? Well, from a personal point of view, AutoCAD is a clear winner when it comes to 2D Design. This is possibly because it was the first CAD software that I learned how to use, and the one that I have used more often. But I am not the only one that thinks this many professionals that use AutoCAD agreed that AutoCAD still trumps the MicroStation with its advanced 2D compose capabilities (Chief, 2012)When it comes to 3D support, I have to give this to MicroStation. I lost attend of how many coffees I had while the computer was rendering a 3D Design. It takes practically forever, so the exceed thing to do was to let the appliance to do the magic and take a break. (Alvarez, 2006)In conclusion, both CAD tools provide features which classi fy them as advanced drafting tools. These tools can be used by CAD designers to draw and design both 2D and 3D Designs, independent of their complexity. (Prakoso, 2011)In summary, I would regard AutoCAD as a better drafting tool, but MicroStation as a better CAD platform.BibliographyHistory of MicroStation MicroStation Wiki MicroStation Be Communities by Bentley. 2014. History of MicroStation MicroStation Wiki MicroStation Be Communities by Bentley. ONLINE procurable at http//communities.bentley.com/products/microstation/w/microstation__wiki/3164.history-of-microstation.aspx. Accessed 10 March 2014.Autodesk Company. 2014. Autodesk Company. ONLINE unattached at http//usa.autodesk.com/ caller-out/. Accessed 10 March 2014.AutoCAD Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. 2014. AutoCAD Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. ONLINE addressable at http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AutoCAD. Accessed 15 March 2014.BE clipping En Espanol Volume 1-Issue 12. 2014. BE Magazine En Espanol Volume 1-Issue 12. ONLINE visible(prenominal) at http//www.nxtbook.com/fx/books/bemagazine/vol1 get out1spanmexico/index.php?startpage=12. Accessed 15 March 2014.MicroStation vs. AutoCAD which is better. 2014. MicroStation vs. AutoCAD which is better. ONLINE Available at http//www.indiacadworks.com/blog/microstation-vs-autocad-comparing-features/. Accessed 15 March 2014.Whats the Difference Between AutoCAD and another(prenominal) 3D programs?. 2014. Whats the Difference Between AutoCAD and Other 3D programs?. ONLINE Available at http//animation.about.com/od/faqs/f/Whats-The-Difference-Between-Autocad-And-Other-3d-Programs.htm. Accessed 15 March 2014.Microstation or Revit..what to choose? assembly Archinect. 2014. Microstation or Revit..what to choose? Forum Archinect. ONLINE Available at http//archinect.com/forum/ drag/96142/microstation-or-revit-what-to-choose. Accessed 18 March 2014.AutoCAD versus MicroStation, which one is the best? CAD Notes. 2014. AutoCAD versus MicroStation, which one is the best? CAD Notes. ONLINE Available at http//www.cad-notes.com/autocad-versus-microstation-which-one-is-the-best/. Accessed 21 March 2014.. 2014. . ONLINE Available at http//www.google.ie/url?sa=trct=jq=esrc=ssource=webcd=6ved=0CF0QFjAFurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcad-software.findthebest.com%2Fcompare%2F5-19%2FAutoCAD-vs-MicroStation-V8iei=So4sU5j-MqWI7AaL5YGgBgusg=AFQjCNHRN8j20Fq52oVzAW6c2-7ihTQpNQbvm=bv.62922401,d.ZGU. Accessed 21 March 2014.Reducing babyishness Obesity wellness publicity or CBTReducing Childhood Obesity Health Promotion or CBTNuRS21010 Understanding Evidence-Based nurse PracticeConceptTermsBoolean OperatorHitsPopulation ChildhoodChildhood, infantile people, shaverren, child, youth.(Childhood obesity or early days people or children or child or your ) and wellness procession or cognitive behavioural therapy38Intervention wellness forwardingHealth, packaging,(Childhood obesity or young people or children or child or your ) and health furtherance o r cognitive behavioural therapy21Comparison Cognitive Behavioural TherapyCBT, behavioural, behavioural(Childhood obesity or young people or children or child or your ) and health promotion or (cognitive behavioural therapy or CBT )17Outcome obesityObese, system of weights gain.(Childhood or young people or children or child or youth ) and ( obesity or obese or weight gain) and health promotion or (cognitive behavioural therapy or CBT )11Which is more egressive in reducing puerility obesity health promotion or Cognitive behavioural therapy?ConceptTermsTruncateHitsPopulation ChildhoodChildhood, young people, children, child, youth.Child* obesity health promotion or cognitive behavioural therapy26Intervention Nurse led health promotionHealth, promotion,Child* obesity and health promotion and cognitive behavioural therapy15Comparison Cognitive Behavioural TherapyCBT, behavioural, behaviouralChild* obesity health promotion or cognitive behaviour* tharap?10The first piece of my essay will be based on the evaluation on my interview this will include looking at the strengths, weaknesses and how I could better it if I were to do it again.I wanted to look into the question which is more effective in reducing childhood obesity, health promotion or Cognitive behavioural therapy? As I find the book bindingic childhood obesity really fascinating especially with the current national epiphytotic of childhood obesity. This made me realise that its a concerning health issue so I wanted to explore the possible disturbances which were available for those torture from childhood obesity. To do this I compared one of the most common interventions (health promotion) to one of the emerging interventions being used to treat childhood obesity (cognitive behavioural therapy). I used the CINHAL database for my literary works search as it provides indexing of the top nurse and allied health literature (CINHAL, 2013) and offers tuition relevant to my question.When enquirying I used truncation I decided to truncate the terms in my query question as I wanted to collect the information which was relevant to my question rather than irrelevant data, as it did not jibe to my question. This worked as each time I truncated I was able to gather data which related to my research question so this was honest mechanism when gathering relevant data.A research mechanism which I used was the Boolean operator to help me find appropriate literature. Boolean operators utilise the terms and, or and not to restrict, increase, or narrow searches depending on Boolean logic, which describes how Boolean operators manipulates erect sets of data (Barker et al 2011).Boolean operators link keywords and phrases this informs the search engine how to interpret the search, which helps target the results the researcher is looking for (Barker et al 2011). By utilizing the Boolean operator it helped narrow my search and provided me with the literature which was relevant to my research question. Because at first when I researched I got a rophy of hits but a majority if the literature was irrelevant and therefore not required, but by using the boolean operator it allowed me to access federal agencyicularized literature for my research question.I think I could have improved my research question by make my research question more specific for instance instead of childhood obesity which is a very large age gathering I could have narrowed it down to teenagers. As this will give me a sense of direction when looking for support literature as its a specific age sort this can be supported by Sackett (2000) who sates that by asking a precise question you can look for specific knowledge for chosen research topic.Whereas with my current question I have a lot to cover as it looks at childhood obesity which is a large-minded age stem, which makes it difficult gathering supporting literature. Another weakness is that although I gathered literature for my research questio n a majority of it was applicable to health promotion interventions in comparison to cognitive behavioural therapy in relation to childhood obesity. So to alter this I think I would have compared health promotional techniques to non-health promotion health techniques. This will verify I get a balance of supporting literature between the comparisons, as there was little literature for cognitive behavioural therapy.This part of the essay will critically appraise intervention for ineffective skyway headway in bronchial asthma attacktic children a controlled and hit-or-missised clinical trial (Lima et al, 2013). The CASP tool (Guyatt et al 1993) will be used to achieve this.1. Was the question clear?The population that was studied was 42 asthmatic children age 2. Was this a randomised controlled trial?The deliberate used a randomised clinical trial (RCT). A RCT is where partakers are randomly allotted to one or more control groups this is determined by the number of interventions ( Parahoo, 2006). Randomisation sum allocating applicants to experimental or control groups at random so that partakers have an equal likelihood of being placed in either group (Lang, 1997). This eradicates selection bias and offers equilibrium amid recognised and unidentified con pitching factors to make a control group similar to the interposition group (Akbong, 2005).The mode was apt for the question being researched as Machin Fayers, (2010) states that RCTs are the main(prenominal) mode for defining the comparative efficacy and safety of substitute medical devices, interventions or treatments. This method is apt for the research as the question aimed to consider the effectiveness of an intervention for the nursing diagnosis of ineffective airline business dynamic headroom in asthmatic children. The study used this method to verify the effect of asthmatic of an intervention for asthmatic children. Lawrence et al (2010) RCTs are the finest for trials determining the have-to doe with of health interventions, theyre very robust and systematic for critiquing the efficiency of health interventions. Though there is a risk of bias when there are errors in the strategy and organisation of a trial (Akobeng, 2005).3.Were participants allocated to intervention group and control groups?The partakers were aptly allocated to intervention and control groups. As participants were allocated to groups via generating an algorithm of random numbers through the use of the R software (Lima et al, 2013). The inclusion criteria in the study were asthma identified by a doctor, based on assessment and physical existence defining features and linked factors termed in the NANDA transnational taxonomy age 4. Were participants and staff blind to participants study group?The team particle who did the randomisation did not partake in the interventions or the outcome evaluation. This collections that the study used blinding which is vital as there is a nemesis in RCTs exploring the benefits of one intervention over an alternative as it can impact outcomes, causing influenced results. Blinding trials reduces bias, blinding refers to the exercise of stopping partakers, health professionals, and those gathering and examining data from knowing who is in the experimental group and who is in the control group, to avert them from being influenced by such knowledge (Day, 2000). Studies show that by blinding patients and health professionals avoids bias. Trials which didnt blind bore more estimates of treatment effects than trials in which authors conveyed blinding (odds ratios overstated, by 17%) (Schulz Grimes, 2002).5. Were all participants accounted in conclusion?All the participants in the study group were followed up for its conclusion. The participants in the control group did not get the option to be in the intervention group or vice versa.6 .Were participants in all groups followed up and data collection in the same way? All the participants were followed up in the study. The effect of the intervention was evaluated at a single moment, overdue to the obstruction of secretion as it reversed readily and linked to working with other professionals (Lima et al, 2013).7. Did the study have enough participants to minimize the chance of play?The study used chi-squared test for power calculation. The test aims to test the hypothesis of no association between two or multiple groups, criteria and population ( air jacket, 2008). The chi test set P=0.061, statically signification was assumed at P 8. What is the main result?The study found an improvement in obstructive symptoms in those who took the intervention offered, with great alterations in the displays of choking and adventitious trace sounds. The generalisations may be limited as children in the intervention group show higher values for age and weight. The group likewise consisted of children under the age of 36 months thus in all likelihood to have asthma attacks (Lima et al, 201 3). This may question the validity of the results found. The study to a fault found there was little research in this topic making it challenging when trying to compare findings with other research (Lima et al, 2013). The study uses a small sample as there are only 42 participants in the study, so not really representative. Akobeng, (2005) argues that when a study uses a small sample of participants in it can be difficult identify the real discrepancys of results found from both the intervention and control group. The study highlights the need for research on airway clearance techniques to assess the effectiveness of its use. The findings raise studies to offer planned interventions during hospitalization to determine the link between the intervention and a decreased in the duration of hospital delay (Lima et al, 2013).9. How precise are these results?The study used MannWhitney test uses the findings of the t-test to identify variances amid two groups of habitually distributed po pulation (Burns Grove, 2005). The Mann Whitney test found that after the intervention, the intervention group showed greater improvement than the control group for the indicators of choking (16.83 vs. 26.17, P = 0.007) and adventitious breath sounds (16.4 vs. 26.6, P = 0.005). This illustrates that the detected variance between the groups is doubtful to have happened by chance hence the null hypothesises rejected due to no variance and the other hypothesis as there is an actual variance in the intervention group is taken into account (Akobeng, 2005).10. Were all vital outcomes considered so the results can be applied?The participants in the study are categorise as asthmatic it doesnt specify the type of asthma they have. cognize they type of asthma they had i.e. chronic or acute asthma is dear as will illustrate if there is a different effect on a patient with certain type of asthma. For instance Schechter (2007) found that airway clearance therapy has little or no effect on acu te asthma, so techniques used in this study may not be applicable for those with acute asthma. Airway clearance techniques requires training in identify for patient or venerationrs to carry it out correctly, this may be an issue for some as they may not have the support or money for training.In relation to parents and carers airway clearance techniques may be a barrier for them when implementing it to their child. As airway clearance techniques require equipment and considerable amount of time (Walsh et al, 2011) to carry out in order to ensure that it is carried out correctly and effectively on child. This can be an issue for parents and carers especially if they dont have the time due to other issues such as work or taking care of other children.According Pryor (2009) to policy makers and health care professionals in the UK, are less likely to utilise the intervention of airway clearance in asthma patients due to the uncertainty of the effectiveness of its usage in asthma patien ts this is also because of little research available on this topic. The study itself also mentions the lack of research available on airway clearance Walsh et al, (2011) techniques for asthma (Lima et al, 2013). Also found although airway clearance techniques have progressed over the days there is little research to illustrate the effectiveness of airway clearance techniques amid the child population who have asthma (Walsh et al, 2011).Reference ListAkobeng AK. Evidence-based child health. 1. Principles of evidence-basedmedicine. Arch Dis Child 20059083740Barker D., Barker M., Pinard , K., (2011). capital of the United Kingdom Cengage Learning.Blaikie N. (2009). Designing Social Research. 2nd ed. UK Polity Press.CINHAL (2013). CINHAL Database (online). Available athttp//www.ebscohost.com/nursing/products/cinahl-databases/cinahl-complete. Accessed at 19th November 2013.Burns N. Grove S.K, (2005). The practise of nursing research conduct, critique and utilisation. 5th ed. USA Elsev ier Saunders.Chia KS. Randomisation magical cure for bias. Ann Acad Med capital of Singapore2000295634.Day SJ, Altman DG. Blinding in clinical trials and other studies. BMJ2000321504.Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, and sidestep DJ (1993).Users guides to the medical literature. II. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. JAMA 1993 270 (21) 2598-2601 and JAMA 1994 271(1) 59-63Lawrence M. Friedman, Furberg C.D, DeMets D (2010). Fundamentals of clinical Trials (online). Available at http//books.google.co.uk/books?id=pIx-0LvD6agCpg=PA97dq=advantages+of+randomised+controlled+trialshl=ensa=Xei=ACbLUtvWBdG0hAf094EIredir_esc=yv=onepageq=advantages%20of%20randomised%20controlled%20trialsf=false Acessed at 6th January 2014.Lang TA, Secic M. How to report statistics in medicine. Philadelphia AmericanCollege of Physicians, 1997.Lima L.H.O, Lopes M.V.O, Falco R.T.S, Freitas R.M.R, Oliveira TF, da Costa M.C.C (2013). Intervention for ineffective airway clearance in asthmatic children A controll ed and randomized clinical trial. International Journal of NursingPractice 2013 19 8894Machin D Fayers P, (2010). Randomized Clinical Trials Design, Practice and Reporting (online). Available athttp//books.google.co.uk/books?id=l6oxPO9riPYCprintsec=frontcoverdq=randomised+clinical+trialhl=ensa=Xei=wSPLUuiqNNSKhQem_YCgDgredir_esc=yv=onepageq=randomised%20clinical%20trialf=false . Accessed at 6th January 2014.NANDA, (2012).Defining NANDA (online). Available at http//www.nanda.org/nanda-international-taxonomy-licensing.html. Accessed at 6th January 2014.Olbricht G Wong Y,(2008). Power and Sample Size numeration (online). Available at http//www.scribd.com/doc/195151500/Power-and-Sample-Size-Calculation . Accessed at 6th January 2014.Parahoo K. (2006) Nursing research principles, process and issues 2 nd ed. Basingstoke Palgrave.Pryor J.A. (2009).Physiotherapy for airway clearance in adults (pdf). Available at http//www.ersj.org.uk/content/14/6/1418.full.pdf Accessed at 3rd January 201 4.Sackett D., Straus S., Richardson S., Rosenberg W., Haynes B (2000). Evidence-Based Medicine How to Practice and Teach EBM. London BMJ Publishing Group.Schulz KF. Assessing allocation blanket and blinding in randomisedcontrolled trials why bother? Evid Based Nurs 20005367.Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, et al. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensionsof methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects incontrolled trials. JAMA 199527340812.Schechter M S.(2007) Airway Clearance Applications in Infants and Children (pdf). Available at http//www.assobrafir.com.br/imagens_up/artigos/Airway_Clearance_Applications_in_Infants_and_Children.pdf Accessed at 27th December 2013.Walsh B.K, Hood K, Merritt G. (2011). Paediatric airway maintenance and clearance in the acute care setting how to stay out of trouble (online). Available at http//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21944689. Accessed at 6th January 2014.West M.D (2008). Use of the Chi-Square Statistic (pdf) .Available at http//ocw.jhsph.edu/courses/fundepiii/PDFs/Lecture17.pdf Accessed at 6th January 2014.